<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Language you speak affects the way you think</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dmalenko.org/2008/05/language-you-speak-affects-the-way-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dmalenko.org/2008/05/language-you-speak-affects-the-way-you-think/</link>
	<description>Envisioning, executing, delivering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:51:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Malenko</title>
		<link>http://www.dmalenko.org/2008/05/language-you-speak-affects-the-way-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Malenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 06:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmsandbox.dreamhosters.com/2008/05/language-you-speak-affects-the-way-you-think/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Hm, &quot;nice try&quot; is also not so bad in that regard. But it seems that such phrases express attitude of the speaker to the event, not the event itself.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I can imagine someone who wants cheer you up would say &quot;&lt;b&gt;That&lt;/b&gt; was a good attempt!&quot;. Those with offensive intents will say &quot;&lt;b&gt;That&lt;/b&gt; was a mistake!&quot; The problem here is that in both cases we do not name the event, but rather refer to it indirectly through &#039;that&#039;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not sure where this can take us, but there is something in all this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, &#8220;nice try&#8221; is also not so bad in that regard. But it seems that such phrases express attitude of the speaker to the event, not the event itself.</p>
<p>I can imagine someone who wants cheer you up would say &#8220;<b>That</b> was a good attempt!&#8221;. Those with offensive intents will say &#8220;<b>That</b> was a mistake!&#8221; The problem here is that in both cases we do not name the event, but rather refer to it indirectly through &#8216;that&#8217;.</p>
<p>Not sure where this can take us, but there is something in all this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Sergienko</title>
		<link>http://www.dmalenko.org/2008/05/language-you-speak-affects-the-way-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Sergienko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmsandbox.dreamhosters.com/2008/05/language-you-speak-affects-the-way-you-think/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&quot;Good attempt&quot; is fine, as for me. It has all the necessary semantics except for &quot;creative&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Good attempt&#8221; is fine, as for me. It has all the necessary semantics except for &#8220;creative&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

